[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@p...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] CFG's and OCaml |
* Erik de Castro Lopo (ocaml-erikd@mega-nerd.com) wrote: > On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 01:25:59 +0100 > Jon Harrop <jon@jdh30.plus.com> wrote: > > > > 1. Are most programming languages designed to be implementable using > > lex and yacc? > > Maybe not lex and yacc, but most are designed to be parsed by > LALR(1) parsers. > > Currently the most difficult to parse language seems to be C++. I vote for TeX as the most difficult language to lex and parse. Alan Schmitt -- The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen. .O. ..O OOO