Browse thread
[Caml-list] Alternative Bytecodes for OCaml
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Alternative Bytecodes for OCaml |
On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 06:56, John Goerzen wrote: > > Two reasons. One: C is the portable interface > > to almost all operating systems -- there are > > This means that you could write an OCaml interface to syscalls. > Granted, that's an advantage, but one I rarely need. Like when you read from a in_channel in Ocaml? You don't need to access the system. But the Ocaml team did, to give you that feature .. :) > > Two: there are a lot of libraries written > > in C with C interfaces, which are either > > compliant with some standard or open source. > > That's true. At the same time, binding to C is just about the most > difficult language I could imagine to bind to. Yeah? Just try interfacing two diffent memory management systems -- eg Ocaml and JVM garbage collectors :) [At least C doesn't really *have* any memory management system :] > I'm not disputing that at all. Obviously this is true. I'm just > suggesting that other approaches have utility, too, because they're > superior in some situations. And I'm not disputing that -- in general. I'm just questioning the utility of accessing inferior technology just to interface inferior libraries. My suggestion was the maximum utility would actually come from this when needing to access *custom* codes -- that is one off applications not worth rewriting, or, proprietary codes you cannot rewrite. > > Surely enhancing OcamlDBI is a viable option? > > I have to talk to several databases who provide drivers only for Windows > ODBC and Java JDBC. There is no hope of OCamlDBI supporting them, > ever. Hmm .. but Windows ODBC is just another C API for databases isn't it? So OcamlDBI can talk to it -- Ocaml does run on Windows :) -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners