On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 06:52:35PM -0400, Shaddin Doghmi wrote:
> this redundancy can be annoying, is there a way to declare Aout only 
> once and still be able to refer to it in b.ml ? How about including 
> a.mli in a.ml somehow? something along the lines of include in C would 
> do it, where including a.h in a.c would make it unnecessary to define 
> something in both...

Someone may have a more elegant solution to this, but when I have a bunch of
types that I don't want to have to repeat, I put them in a .ml file without a
corresponding .mli file.

Kenn

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners