Browse thread
[Caml-list] Are map and iter guaranteed to be called in forwards order?
-
Richard Jones
- Damien Doligez
-
John Prevost
-
Richard Jones
- Anil Madhavapeddy
- Jean-Marie Gaillourdert
- John Prevost
- Jon Harrop
-
Richard Jones
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jean-Marie Gaillourdert <jmg@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Are map and iter guaranteed to be called in forwards order? |
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 17. August 2004 16:56 schrieb Richard Jones:
> This came up because I wanted a sensible way to number a list of
> items. The obvious imperative approach is:
>
> # let items = ['a';'c';'e';'g';'i'];;
> val items : char list = ['a'; 'c'; 'e'; 'g'; 'i']
> # let i = ref 0;;
> val i : int ref = {contents = 0}
> # let items = List.map (fun item -> let n = !i in incr i; n, item)
> items;; val items : (int * char) list =
> [(0, 'a'); (1, 'c'); (2, 'e'); (3, 'g'); (4, 'i')]
>
> The functional approach is comparatively long-winded: you have to
> effectively write your own loop explicitly, and the obvious way to
> write it isn't tail recursive, so you have to do it with accumulators.
>
> It'd be nicer to have a library HOF to do this.
There is a higher order function to do this: fold
List.rev
(List.fold_left (fun xs x ->
match xs with
[] -> [(0,x)]
| (i,_)::_ -> (i+1,x)::xs) [] items);;
Regards,
Jean-Marie
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners