On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Jon Harrop wrote:

> I believe you are unnecessarily constraining the AST to be a binary
> tree. 

No, I was trying to make a graphical point.

> I think Skaller referred to the implementation of a parser for this as a 
> "chain operator", which I understand to be a way non-associative operators 
> may be parsed to create a node in the AST with a list of operands, rather 
> than the usual pair of operands.

Yep.  But notice where the trick was- it wasn't in the yacc grammar, it 
was in the Ocaml code.  He parsed the sequence as:
     <
    / \
   a   <
      / \
     b   c

Forget I said AST.  How are the yacc rules applied?

-- 
"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea -- massive,
difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of
mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it."
                                - Gene Spafford 
Brian

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners