Browse thread
[Caml-list] Alternative Bytecodes for OCaml
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Alternative Bytecodes for OCaml |
On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 19:50, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote: > W liĆcie z sob, 28-08-2004, godz. 11:35 +0200, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk > napisaĆ: > > > Exceptions are also doable, in such a way that they are wrapped and > > unwrapped automatically. > > I meant: except in C++, which doesn't provide a way to generically wrap > an exception of an unknown type in an object of a known representation. The problem here is: if you have a universal architecture, such as JVM or CLR -- it defeats some of the most important reasons to choose one language over another, which is often the novel architecture. -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners