On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 02:21, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
> skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> 
> >> But how does it know it? How to specify that in a different way than
> >> for make?
> >
> > I could suggest some, but first: you could use the same
> > way as for make.
> 
> How does it simplify my life if I have to write the same Makefile as
> for make?

By build rule I mean the thing
in a makefile after the TAB character. 

> > However your dependency specification is treated like
> > an optimisation.
> 
> It can't be so, because parts of the information about which sources
> to compile is encoded *only* in dependencies in a Makefile.

You can just compile the lot.

For Ocaml code I personally use a linear list with my 
own timestamp checking, and when i find a change
everything in the list thereafter is built.

-- 
John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net



-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners