Browse thread
[Caml-list] Announcing the OMake build system version 0.9.1
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-09-05 (19:09) |
From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Announcing the OMake build system version 0.9.1 |
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 02:21, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote: > skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net> writes: > > >> But how does it know it? How to specify that in a different way than > >> for make? > > > > I could suggest some, but first: you could use the same > > way as for make. > > How does it simplify my life if I have to write the same Makefile as > for make? By build rule I mean the thing in a makefile after the TAB character. > > However your dependency specification is treated like > > an optimisation. > > It can't be so, because parts of the information about which sources > to compile is encoded *only* in dependencies in a Makefile. You can just compile the lot. For Ocaml code I personally use a linear list with my own timestamp checking, and when i find a change everything in the list thereafter is built. -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners