Browse thread
[Caml-list] strange behaviour of ocamldoc
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-09-15 (14:17) |
From: | Jon Harrop <jon@j...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Confused |
On Wednesday 15 September 2004 14:28, Jon Harrop wrote: > # let rec build = function 0 -> [] | n -> 1e-6 :: build (n-1) in > let test = 1. :: build 1000;; > Syntax error > > Am I being stupid? Yes! The correct syntax is, of course: let test = let rec build = function 0 -> [] | n -> 1e-6 :: build (n-1) in 1. :: build 1000;; So the "let" returned to the top-level has to be the outermost one. All inner "let"s must be followed by "in" and an expression. Thanks, John and Christoph and anyone else who replies before I get this off. ;-) Cheers, Jon. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners