Browse thread
[Caml-list] Gripes with array
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-09-11 (17:47) |
From: | Lars Nilsson <chamaeleon@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] 32-bit is sticking around |
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:56:11 +0100, Jon Harrop <jon@jdh30.plus.com> wrote: > On Saturday 11 September 2004 16:30, Lars Nilsson wrote: > > > StrongARM? > > > > You mean the technology they bought instead of develop it? > > Intel have developed it quite substantially, IMHO. AFAIK, nobody else has made > such a superscalar/deeply-pipelined CPU with such a conditional instruction > set before, and that's not easy. > > Cheers, > Jon. Sure, they have probably done quite a bit of innovation with it by now. All I know is that back in 1987-88 I was happily doing assembly GUI programming just because it (ARM) was so darn easy to work with, while x86 made my stomach turn. Lars ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners