Browse thread
[Caml-list] (Announce) ocamlyacc tutorial (version 0.1)
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-09-01 (12:08) |
From: | Sven Luther <sven.luther@w...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] (Announce) ocamlyacc tutorial (version 0.1) |
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 01:55:35PM +0200, Florian Hars wrote: > >Or get the permission of the ocaml manual authors for this modification. > > But even then you still cannot mix it with the GFDL bison manual. Or, at > least I would not want to try to figure out how to to that... Maybe if you > got INRIA's permission for your changes and then include it all as an > invariant section so that nobody would be forced to ask INRIA for > permission for further changes, since they would not be allowed anyway. But > this part is not "secondary" so it is debatable whether it could be an > invariant section. Alternatively, the ocaml manual authors could relicence the parts under a GFDL compatible licence, not that the GFDL with invariant part is a free licence though, so you would really not gain much with that. > Combining works under different free licenses is hard enough, trying it > with non-free licenses (whose flamewar/GR was that?) is worse. Indeed. A general freeing of the ocaml documentation would be welcome here. Friendly, Sven Luther ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners