Browse thread
[Caml-list] C++ STL and template features compared with OCaml parametric polymorphism and OO features
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] C++ STL and template features compared with OCaml parametric polymorphism and OO features |
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 00:04, Brian Hurt wrote: > On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Jon Harrop wrote: > Second, you can do fold, map, iter, etc. in C++- it's just a pain. To > emulate HOFs you define a new class with single virtual member function. > The virtual member function then becomes your HOF. For templates all you need is a class with an operator()() method. Dynamic dispatch is only needed if you need run time function variables (first class functions). Heh .. it isn't a pain doing this in C++, its quite easy -- just use Felix. -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners