From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@bononia.it>

> On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 06:15:31PM +0900, Jacques GARRIGUE wrote:
> > > even "ocamlc -i" fails ! 
> > You're right.
> 
> Anyway, shouldn't this be considered an "ocamlc -i" bug?
> 
> I used to assume that:
> 
>   ocamlc -i a.ml > a.mli
>   ocamlc -c a.mli
>   ocamlc -c a.ml
> 
> should work for every compilable a.ml. Was I wrong?

This is intended to be so, eventhough this is not always easy to print
a type both exactly and concisely...
In the present case, there clearly seems to be a bug, independently of
the error in the example.

Jacques Garrigue

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners