Browse thread
[Caml-list] Unix module and threads
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Unix module and threads |
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 23:42, Markus Mottl wrote: > Always use absolute paths to avoid problems in multi-threaded contexts. I go so far as to suggest relative paths be resolved into absolute ones ASAP in almost all contexts: even a correct singly threaded program using relative paths is likely to be fragile (meaning the correctness property is easy to clobber with small changes). -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners