skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net> writes:

>> But how does it know it? How to specify that in a different way than
>> for make?
>
> I could suggest some, but first: you could use the same
> way as for make.

How does it simplify my life if I have to write the same Makefile as
for make?

> However your dependency specification is treated like
> an optimisation.

It can't be so, because parts of the information about which sources
to compile is encoded *only* in dependencies in a Makefile.

-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak@knm.org.pl
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners