English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Observations on OCaml vs. Haskell
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-09-28 (01:57)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Observations on OCaml vs. Haskell
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 06:24, Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 02:08:51PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:

> Performance again.  The reason why there are so many numeric types in
> OCaml is performance.  

Also it is related to compatibility with external libraries.

> The compiler could very easily make the arithmetic operators polymorphic,
> and constrain the operands to be of the same (numeric) type

G'Caml generics would handle this easily, without 
need to 'kludge' the Ocaml compiler. 

John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net

To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners