Richard Jones wrote:
 > On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 10:29:09PM +0100, chris.danx wrote:

[snip]

> Because we didn't want to put in the effort to do a native WxWindows
> port, and the Perl/Python options would have been too slow and clunky.

Sorry, I meant how did you find Gtk+ on Windows?  Was Gtk-Wimp 
successful at presenting a Windows style interface?  I have only used 
gtk-wimp in the context of a code editor, gps - for Ada development, it 
seemed much closer to the Windows L&F but IIRC it wasn't entirely there. 
  This was a while ago though.


>>Thankfully it's a Tetris clone.  No dialogs required. :)
> 
> That could be a problem.  Check that WxWindows supports a sufficiently
> advanced canvas.  It didn't when we were looking at it - we needed the
> complex canvas support in Gtk for the real-time updating graphs we
> were producing.

WxWidgets supports OpenGL now, so if there was a binding that would be 
an option.


Chris

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners