On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 23:49:35 +0100
Jon Harrop <jon@jdh30.plus.com> wrote:

> I am under the impression that French Copyright laws make this difficult. 
> IIRC, there was a post by Xavier long ago...

Anybody have a pointer to this?

> Would it be a good idea to have a replacement instead of a supplement? 

I'm really comparing the situation with Python. If I write some
Python code, I KNOW that there are about 100 modules (including
some pretty esoteric stuff see http://docs.python.org/modindex.html)
that are GUARANTEED to be available at any destination which has
Python included.

The guaranteed availablity of huge variety of modules is something
I really miss in O'Caml, and thats on top of the fact that even
the standard modules have missing components like I pointed out
in the my earlier email in this thread.

Cheers,
Erik
-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
  Erik de Castro Lopo  nospam@mega-nerd.com (Yes it's valid)
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"The X-files is too optimistic. The truth is not out there."
-- Anthony Ord

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners