[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: OCAML Downcasting? |
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 16:31, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote: > sometimes the cost outweights the benefits. For example static > detection of possible division by 0 would be impractical. You could use a monad .. :) > And guess what? No language I know checks division by 0 statically Hehe --:> include "std"; print (1/0); endl; [skaller@pelican] ~>flxg aa EXCEPTION Division_by_zero That's a compile time error (Dang -- and its a bug too, the error should report the location .. :) But I assume you mean 'exhaustively'. -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners