English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Re: OCAML Downcasting?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-09-22 (10:50)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: OCAML Downcasting?
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 16:31, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:

> sometimes the cost outweights the benefits. For example static
> detection of possible division by 0 would be impractical.

You could use a monad .. :)

> And guess what? No language I know checks division by 0 statically

Hehe --:>

include "std";
print (1/0); endl;

[skaller@pelican] ~>flxg aa

That's a compile time error (Dang -- and its a bug too,
the error should report the location .. :)

But I assume you mean 'exhaustively'.

John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net

To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners