Cláudio Valente <cvalente@co.sapo.pt> writes:

>> And guess what? No language I know checks division by 0 statically
>> (except proof checkers, but they are not suitable for writing big
>> programs - too much work)

> These are not exhaustive tests, but they are good enough to catch
> many common errors.

I meant exhaustive tests, not heuristics for easy cases where the
divisor is constant.

-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak@knm.org.pl
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners