Browse thread
[Caml-list] Announcing the OMake build system version 0.9.1
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David Brown <caml-list@d...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Omake] Re: [Caml-list] Announcing the OMake build system version 0.9.1 |
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 10:54:09PM -0500, Brian Hurt wrote: > Yes. On the core interpreter, no. On the global omake file, yes. For > two reasons. First off, reimplementing someone else's code (even in a > different language) does create a derivitive work. Just like translating > a novel into a different language creates a derivitive work. Making it a > BSD license or similiar quashes this concern. Also, it encourages people > to grab the file in whole and just edit it, making an obvious derivitive > work. Although, if it needs to be changed, this should probably be reported as a bug. This is important, since this file changes as new versions of omake come out. Dave ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners