Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] laziness
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: William Lovas <wlovas@s...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] laziness
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 01:55:05PM +0100, Jon Harrop wrote:
> On Monday 06 September 2004 01:57, Richard Jones wrote:
> > One thing that worries me about laziness.
> >
> > Doesn't laziness often indicate a bug in the code?
> [...]
> So laziness can be used as an optimisation.

Laziness has a particularly special place for pure languages like Haskell.
Some algorithms cannot be expressed with the same asymptotic complexity in
a pure eager language as in an impure eager language.  But this complexity
gap can be closed by making the pure language lazy:


To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: