Damien Doligez writes:
 > 
 > > But I must  agree with you: this is definitely too  small and we could
 > > imagine  that, when the  tag says  a block  is an  array, the  size is
 > > stored within the first (or the last) field instead.
 > 
 > The last, really?

How stupid I am! I was thinking of not adding an extra addition to the
array access, keeping the first array  element at field 0 but it is of
course ridiculous.

-- 
Jean-Christophe

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners