Browse thread
[Caml-list] Gripes with array
-
Jon Harrop
- Ville-Pertti Keinonen
- Jean-Christophe Filliatre
- Damien Doligez
- brogoff
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-09-09 (07:17) |
From: | Jean-Christophe Filliatre <Jean-Christophe.Filliatre@l...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Gripes with array |
Jon Harrop writes: > > Does anyone have any pointers to information about the origin of the size > limit for arrays? I assume it is something to do with the garbage collector > using a fixed-size tag instead of a variable-size one but I'd be interested > in the details. In ocaml sources, the file byterun/mlvalues.h gives all details about the block header structure. There you can see that, on 32 bits architecture, the block size (in words) is stored on 22 bits. And indeed Sys.max_array_length is equal to 2^22-1. But I must agree with you: this is definitely too small and we could imagine that, when the tag says a block is an array, the size is stored within the first (or the last) field instead. -- Jean-Christophe Filliâtre ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners