Browse thread
[Caml-list] Announcing the OMake build system version 0.9.1
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | chris.danx <chris.danx@n...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Announcing the OMake build system version 0.9.1 |
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote: > skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net> writes: > > >>The basic problem is that make assumes a fixed set >>of target outputs and has rules like: >> >> A depends on B: use P to make A from B >> >>This means you have to know all the outputs, >>dependencies, and build rules in advance >>which is *never* the case on any realistic system. >> >>The way forward is to rethink the fundamentals. >>Interscript works like this: >> >> if anything changes rebuild > > > Rebuild what? Everything? It's not an option. When I repeatedly make > a change in one file and try how it works, it would be silly to wait > several minutes for recompilation of everything else. Only what needs to be rebuilt! ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners