Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
bigarrays much lower than normal ones
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: malc <malc@p...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] bigarrays much lower than normal ones
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Hal Daume III wrote:

> I've been hitting the limiting size of normal float arrays and was having
> a look at the Bigarray module.  Unfortunately, it seems roughly 3-4 times
> *slower* than the standard array, which is pretty much unacceptable for
> me.  Am I doing something naively wrong, or are the Bigarrays truly this
> slow?  The timing results I get (i686, redhat) are along the liens of:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&c2coff=1&safe=off&threadm=fa.hj2u7jv.t1ms25%40ifi.uio.no&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dbigarray%2Bmalc%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26c2coff%3D1%26safe%3Doff%26selm%3Dfa.hj2u7jv.t1ms25%2540ifi.uio.no%26rnum%3D1

-- 
mailto:malc@pulsesoft.com