Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
bigarrays much lower than normal ones
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: malc <malc@p...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] bigarrays much lower than normal ones
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Hal Daume III wrote:

> I've been hitting the limiting size of normal float arrays and was having
> a look at the Bigarray module.  Unfortunately, it seems roughly 3-4 times
> *slower* than the standard array, which is pretty much unacceptable for
> me.  Am I doing something naively wrong, or are the Bigarrays truly this
> slow?  The timing results I get (i686, redhat) are along the liens of: