[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Radu Grigore <radugrigore@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] really HO Functions |
Thanks everyone who answered. On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:48:11 +0200 (CEST), Jean-Baptiste Rouquier <jrouquiethearchiveshouldhaveafewantispamtricks@ens-lyon.fr> wrote: > Out of curiosity, may I ask why you're looking for such functions ? I am learning OCaml now. The last two-three days I've written a small prototype; then I have reviewed it and one of the observations was that it contains no second-order function. Possible reasons: 1. higher order functions are hard (intellectually unmanageable) 2. HOFs are not needed in practice above a certain order 3. failure to recognize places where a HOF is needed (beyond the standard examples in tutorial). Number 3 was what prompted me to ask the question: a few examples always help. Unfortunately I didn't yet had time to read the cited articles :(. -- regards, radu http://rgrig.idilis.ro/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners