Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] Single-case union types as strong typedefs
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Single-case union types as strong typedefs
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 01:05, Jacques Carette wrote:

> I consider a linker to be an integral part of a compiler 'suite'. 
>  I could not care less when a particular code 
> optimization is done.  If it *has* to be done by the linker, then so be it.  
> I do not understand why link-time 
> optimizations seem to have been somehow less research-worthy 
> than other parts of the compiler.

Why do we need separate compilation 
and linkage in the style of C on modern systems?

Surely, we would like to have fast compilations, but 
why can't the compiler treat that as an automatic
optimisation, rather than a user managed one?

-- 
John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net