Browse thread
replacing Mathematica was: Polymorphic pretty printing
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] replacing Mathematica was: Polymorphic pretty printing |
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 05:15, HENRIKSON, JEFFREY wrote: > > I'm curious why people want to use these kinds of routines. What does > > printf style mini-language printing have to offer compared to just > using > > plain old Ocaml functions? > > Sounds like Skaller doesn't like toplevels. Fine with me. I like them. I don't dislike them -- I think it is more that I'm not using them heavily, and didn't really understand the need for pretty printing .. I do now. -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net