Browse thread
[Caml-list] Recursive lists
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Yamagata Yoriyuki <yoriyuki@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] About Obj |
From: Jon Harrop <jon@jdh30.plus.com> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] About Obj (was Recursive lists) Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:33:03 +0100 > Yes, your Obj implementation is substantially bigger, more complicated, more > error prone and more costly on small lists. Just forget this whole thread > ever happened and consider using a different data structure. :-) > > Can Obj not be hidden so that people can't use it so easily? Yes, it would be nice to have a compiler option which disable all causes of the evil (Obj.magic, Array.unsafe_get, external etc). Then we can control where unsafe operations are used. -- Yamagata Yoriyuki ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners