Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] Are you sure the new "=" of 3.08 is good ?
- Harrison, John R
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Harrison, John R <johnh@i...> |
| Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] Are you sure the new "=" of 3.08 is good ? |
| What I did in my soon-to-be-released automatic prover, following | advice from Pierre Weis, was to hash-cons all the terms used by the | program. Now I only need to use pointer equality: if the pointers | are not the same then I know the terms are not the same. The speedup | was a factor of 100 because my program does lots of comparisons and | hashing of terms. Yes, it might well be worth looking at that again. I tried it once in CAML Light and the results were disappointing. But one reason was that something like weak pointers either didn't exist or I didn't know about them, so my hash tables rendered some ephemeral stuff non-collectible. I'll look forward to the release of your prover! John. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners