Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] C++ STL and template features compared with OCaml parametric polymorphism and OO features
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Keith Wansbrough <Keith.Wansbrough@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Factoring HOFs
> OCaml has been supporting nested quantifiers for years.
> However, they are a little more verbose because we chose to allow
> unpredicate 2nd order types, which are harder to infer.

Apologies; I didn't realise this.  Thanks for the pointer.

--KW 8-)

-- 
Keith Wansbrough <kw217@cl.cam.ac.uk>
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/kw217/
University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory.

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners