Browse thread
[Caml-list] Polymorphic pretty printing
-
Andrej Bauer
-
Christophe TROESTLER
- Andrej Bauer
-
Christophe TROESTLER
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Andrej Bauer <Andrej.Bauer@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Polymorphic pretty printing |
Christophe TROESTLER wrote: > >> Am I supposed to rewrite half of toplevel.ml to get this working? > > I am afraid that the awser is yes :(. Let's see why: Thanks for the hints. I'd be willing to take a shot at writing a more flexible toplevel, one that allows to install polymorphic pretty-printers in a sane way. I am imagining something like this. A pretty printer may be registered with #install_printer, as before. But we need to fiddle with the types of printers to get things working. A printer pp for type t (where t may be polymorphic) would have type pp : Format.formatter -> t -> (Format.formatter -> 'a -> unit) -> unit If you compare this with the current type, you'll notice the extra argument of type (Format.formatter -> 'a -> unit). This is a helper function which would be passed to pp by the toplevel. Then pp can use it to print out any polymorphic value. Does this sound like a sound plan? Or am I missing something? Perhaps the ocaml developers secretly posses such a toplevel already. Andrej ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners