Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] Single-case union types as strong typedefs
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: David Brown <caml-list@d...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Single-case union types as strong typedefs
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 12:31:39PM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote:

> The problem you describe only occurs when your single constructor has
> only one argument.
> Indeed, this would be nice to have the overhead compiled away.
> I don't remember whether there was a concrete reason not to.

Another reason is that is breaks compatibility with existing C bindings, or
at least potentially does.


To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: