Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] Polymorphism and the "for" loop
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Polymorphism and the "for" loop
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 12:22, Robert M. Solovay wrote:
> How does one define a function f of type int -> void? I looked in the
> OCaml manual and couldn't find any reference to "void". {It is, of course,
> a familiar concept in C.}

That's right. Ocaml has no void type. I consider that a bug.
Briefly, it was possible to define one using polymorphic variants:

	type void = []

however that feature was removed. In any case that would
not be enough, since many standard functions would still
return the wrong type.

-- 
John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net



-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners