Browse thread
[Caml-list] Recursive lists
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alex Baretta <alex@b...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Recursive lists |
sejourne_kevin wrote:
>
> (** Take a list and connect the end on the beginning
> Copyright : Kévin ;)
> *)
> let cycle l =
> let rl= ref l in
> let rec go_fin = function
> [] -> invalid_arg "cycle:[] can't be !"
> | [x] as f -> Obj.set_field (Obj.repr f) 1 (Obj.repr !rl);l
> | x::reste-> go_fin reste
> in go_fin l
> ;;
> I haven't test GC issu.
>
Nice code. So clean. So idiomatic. So type-safe... Well, it's really
this Obj stuff is the best we can do with the current intuition of
recursive values implemented in the Ocaml compiler.
Let me suggest a slightly safer version:
let cycle l =
let l = List.rev (List.rev l) in
let rl= ref l in
let rec go_fin = function
[] -> invalid_arg "cycle:[] can't be !"
| [x] as f -> Obj.set_field (Obj.repr f) 1 (Obj.repr !rl);
| x::reste-> go_fin reste
in go_fin l
This first duplicates the original list so that aliasing is not an issue.
BTW, I've just discovered that List.append is safe with respect to an
infinite second argurment, which is a totally desirable property. It is
open to discussion as to whether append should analyze l1 for cyclicity
Alex
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners