[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | szegedy@t... |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Nested modules: signature restriction possible? |
I am writing a code with almost the same functionality and I was also bugged by the same problem and posed the same question in the functional mailing list. Julien Signoles was kind enough to answer: > I also encounter this annoying situation. In general, I solve it in the > following way: > > module type A = sig type t val f: t -> t end > module type B = sig include A val g: t -> t end > module type C' = sig type c val h: c -> c end > module type C = sig include A include C' with type c = t end > module type D = sig include B include C' with type c = t end > > Sadly, this solution uses some additional types and with-type constraints > but IMHO it is the best when your signatures are big. > > Hope this helps, I've got a similar algebra package as yours, but my design is quite pragmatic: I have only programmed those parts I really needed. I send my version in a separate mail. It would be fun to cooperate, if you would like to. (What I currently think about is the GCD computation over multivariate polynomial fields (it is needed for the functions field), and it is hard to get it efficient. After I solved it, I will want to programm Groebner base manipluation.) Best regards, Christian