On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:

> On Sunday 21 November 2004 13:51, skaller wrote:
>> They're not ignoring contributions, they're being
>> selective as they must be.
>
> I see that I was wrong, I misunderstood malc's post. I can't bear when I
> see people which are actually "ignored" in the sense that they post
> interesting work and they don't get any reply, but this is not the case
> - obviously nobody is required to integrate any possible patch in the
> mainstream compiler (even if, to speak about this precise case, dynamic
> loading of C code is a very interesting feature).

Sorry, but you are wrong again, this particular case is about dynamic
loading of OCaml code, for C code there isn't and never was any problem.

-- 
mailto:malc@pulsesoft.com