Browse thread
A second functor question
-
John F. Hughes
- Alain Frisch
- Andreas Rossberg
- Christophe TROESTLER
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-11-20 (07:45) |
From: | Alain Frisch <Alain.Frisch@i...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] A second functor question |
John F. Hughes wrote: > I'd like it to work. In other words, I'd like a way to promise to the > type system > that A.t and B.t (within a COMBINE) are always the same. module type COMBINE = sig module A : P module B : P with type t = A.t end;; You need to keep the P1.t and P2.t fields public, otherwise the constraint cannot be checked: module P1 = struct ... end;; module P2 = struct ... end;; or: module P1 : P with type t = int = ... module P2 : P with type t = int = ... Btw, maybe you did it on purpose, but the type annotation in: let f x:Z.A.t = Z.B.foo x is upon the result type of f, not its argument (in your case, it's the same). Note also you don't need to combine the two structures in a single module, you can just define a functor with several arguments: module Fun(A : P)(B : P with type t = A.t) = struct let f x = B.foo x end -- Alain