Browse thread
Why doesn't ocamlopt detect a missing ; after failwith statement?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Why doesn't ocamlopt detect a missing ; after failwith statement? |
On Nov 26, 2004, at 06:25, Jacques Garrigue wrote: > I believe the problem with failwith is solvable, albeit rather > complicated. The idea is that you want to be warned when you apply a > function of type (\forall 'a. 'a) to something, because no such > function may exist, so that this application will never actually take > place. More generally, you want to output a warning whenever the computation of such a value is not immediately followed by a join in the control flow graph, because at that point you know you're compiling dead code. Then you would also get a warning for things like this: failwith "foo"; print_string "hello world" or f (a, b, failwith "foo", c, d) etc. Don't ask me to implement it, though. -- Damien