Browse thread
Objective Caml release 3.08.2
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Frédéric_Gava <frederic.gava@w...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Objective Caml release 3.08.2 |
> So I would tend to think it may well be worthwhile adding > an unordered set to Ocaml. I guess some operations may > change from O(log N) to O(1), or from O(N log N) to just O(N), > eg fold. Good Idea. In this case, with the same interface (but not the same specification), it would be easier to optimize some functions (in my case, I thinks about parallel implementation) Frédéric Gava