[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Serge <serge@s...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Worsening standard library |
> Any reason not to use 'scanf'? Complexity. I do not mind having scanf, but using it requires some understanding of modules, format strings and polymorphic types. And people are unlikely to get bothered by these as soon as they are unable to feed numbers into their simple programs. That's the catch. Reading numbers should hardly be more complicated than reading strings, IMHO. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Serge S. Bityukov, Moscow State University, Dept of Mechanics and Mathematics