Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
bigarrays much lower than normal ones
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] bigarrays much lower than normal ones
On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 03:05, Hal Daume III wrote:

> I'm also really shocked that the 32 bit float bigarrays are slower than 
> the 64 bit ones!

IEEE hardware loads/saves 64 bit and converts internally to 80 bit.
32 bit requires extra conversions. OTOH you might save on memory
and gain some performance wrt caches.

-- 
John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net