Browse thread
environment idiom
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Michael Walter <michael.walter@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] environment idiom |
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:29:05 +0100 (CET), Thomas Fischbacher > Hm, I think Klaus would strongly object to any statement of the form > > > you can clearly see what you are getting by simply looking at > > the type (IO Int). > > as every type will contain junk: > > (x::IO Int) where x = x >>= return Sure. You can include the "junk" into your reasoning (and also take the fact that you might never actually get anything into account). Anyway, my statement was more of a pun at the WYSIWYG mentioned by the poster I was replying to, than a definite theoretical statement. Cheers, Michael