Browse thread
Possibility of Nested Classes and Nested Inheritance?
-
Jørgen Hermanrud Fjeld
- John Prevost
- Jacques Garrigue
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-12-17 (01:32) |
From: | Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@m...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Possibility of Nested Classes and Nested Inheritance? |
From: "Jørgen Hermanrud Fjeld" <jhf@hex.no> > I just read about the work by Nystrom, Chong and Myers on nested > inheritance, specifically the article "Scalable Extensibility via Nested > Inheritance". > > The article does demonstrate fascinating, to me, use of inheritance, and > I wonder if it is possible to do something similar and > object-oriented in OCaml. > > To do something similar would, according to my understanding, require > both inner classes and super-class polymorphism. > In understand inner classes as implicitly polymorphic with respect > to the enclosing class, > and polymorphism on the super class as the practical ability to extend > the type hierarchy upwards. > > Do you know of any work that relate nested inheritance to OCaml, or that > address the similar issuesof inner classes and super-class polymorphism? Answer 1: there are no inner classes in ocaml. Answer 2: there are plenty of other ways to obtain similar effects. I don't know exactly what fascinated you in the paper, so it is hard to answer precisely, but there are already a few techniques in ocaml to solve the problems they describe. (Of course they wouldn't cite them, as ocaml doesn't look like a relevant language to them.) Their compiler example seems to be a variant of the expression problem. There are several solutions to the expression problem in ocaml, using either polymorphic variants http://wwwfun.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~garrigue/papers/fose2000.html or objects http://pauillac.inria.fr/~remy/work/expr/ On the more general question of virtual types, Didier Rémy and Jérôme Vouillon gave a detailed "refutation". http://pauillac.inria.fr/~remy/work/virtual/ So you can see if you can do all what you need with the above methods. If you find some unexpected limitation, please let us now. Jacques Garrigue