English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[OT] Rant about VCS
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-12-17 (20:13)
From: Erik de Castro Lopo <ocaml-erikd@m...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [OT] Rant about VCS
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:42:51 -0800
Paul Snively <psnively@mac.com> wrote:

> If all of this is too much, consider GNU Arch in its tla incarnation, 
> which does version file flags on POSIX filesystems, and also has very 
> good EMACS integration in the form of XTLA.

I'm using GNU Arch for large amounts of C, C++, Python, Ocmal, plain 
text and LateX.

I think Arch is the best thing since sliced bread. The ony problem is
it doesn't like ms windows. It stores files in a really deep directory
structure and its really easy to run into the limit of how long
a pathname can be on windows.

If you are Unix only Arch is well worth a look. Its a bit difficult
to set up and get the hang of, but if you are not on windows, its
well worth it.

  Erik de Castro Lopo  nospam@mega-nerd.com (Yes it's valid)
"No Silicon Heaven?  Preposterous!  Where would
all the calculators go?" -- Kryten, Red Dwarf