Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Poly variants
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Christophe TROESTLER <Christophe.Troestler@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Poly variants
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Yaron Minsky <yminsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I don't think the critique applies.  Variant types can be
> distinguished by the leading tick.  Why do they need to be
> uppercased as well?  I suppose it would provide some extra visual
> uniformity with [...]

I agree -- I personally would wish that the back tick only
distinguishes between normal and polymorphic variant constructors.

ChriS