[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Nicolas George <nicolas.george@e...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Checking for eof |
Le sextidi 6 nivôse, an CCXIII, briand@aracnet.com a écrit :
> try
> (input_line chan), false
> with
> | End_of_file -> "", true
I would have written that
try
Some (input_line chan)
with
| End_of_file -> None
but the idea is the same. I find it is an irritating limitation of OCaml
syntax to have to pack and then unpack all local values in order to uncatch
exceptions. Something like
try
let line = input_line chan in
untry
loop (line :: rlst)
with
| End_of_file -> List.rev rlst
This syntax is somewhat awkward: untry is neither a third member of the
try...with structure, because it must be inside the flow of let...in
declaration, nor a stand-alone statement, because it must not be allowed
anywhere outside try...with.
On the contrary, as far as I can see, the semantics is quite simple.