Browse thread
generic functions
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-01-09 (17:16) |
From: | David McClain <dmcclain1@m...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] generic functions |
> With the exception of certain artificial contests (Paul Graham) I've never > met a real world problem that needed overloading, or even benefitted > signifigantly from overloading that didn't benefit just as much or more > from one of the solutions above. I would mention ad-hoc, interactive, engineering computing, e.g., NML, Mathematica, MatLab, where generic functions and overloading are extremely useful. But none of these languages can produce safe code, and I would never recommend using any of them for production releases of software. OCaml = strong safety. NML and others = fast interactive exploratory programming, but not safe. David McClain Senior Corporate Scientist Avisere, Inc. +1.520.390.7738 (USA) david.mcclain@avisere.com