[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Stefan Monnier <monnier@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: Ocaml license - why not GPL? |
>> The only thing that would be restricted would be if your program links
>> with or uses parts of the compiler itself.
> A commercial product may bundle and use the ocaml compilers and run-time in
> their entirety (e.g. by executing ocamlopt) without infringing the license.
> Commercial products may not link to or lift code from the compilers though,
> of course, as this counts as redistribution of a modification to the
> compiler.
The GPL does not put any restriction on commercial use. Only on
proprietary use. Do not confuse the two.
> IMHO, academics be encouraged by their funding bodies to release their
> code under an artistic/BSD license because they are funded by the tax
> payer. Naturally, this shouldn't apply to me.
[...]
> Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
AFAIK much consulting work pays for the service, not for the code, in which
case GPL code can be used without any problem.
Stefan